Doerr v. Doerr, KY, Relief From Agreement, Jurisdition To Modify

Doerr v. Doerr, __ S.W.3d. __ (Ky. App. 2008), 2006-CA-000739-MR

Doerr v. Doerr, __ S.W.3d. __ (Ky. App. 2008), 2006-CA-000739-MR

The parties were divorced in 1990 and the divorce decree contained a provision regarding the husband’s retirement benefits. In 2005, when the husband retired from the Louisville AFSS Department of Transportation FAA, he noticed that his ex-wife was receiving more than her intended share of the benefits. In order to correct the error, since the settlement agreement failed to adequately address the issue, he filed a motion with the TC to modify the decree. The TC denied the motion finding that it lacked appropriate jurisdiction and recommended that the husband seek relief in federal court. COA found that the TC does have proper jurisdiction under 5 CFR § 838.101 (a), which specifically states that state courts have the authority to resolve disagreements concerning validity or provisions of any court order. Reversed and remanded.
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. Skaggs + Associates

Recent Posts

Adoption Day Celebration in Jefferson Family Court scheduled for November 19, 2021
October 8, 2021
Panda Puzzle
Both Parents’ Rights Must Be Terminated Prior to Adoption; Doctrine of Partial Waiver of Custodial Rights Still Good Law Post-Obergefell – Published Opinion from Supreme Court of Ky.
October 4, 2021
100 Dollar Bill
Party Produced Sufficient Evidence to Prove Medical Malpractice Settlement Proceeds Were Nonmarital – Published Opinion from Ky. Court of Appeals
October 4, 2021