One To Be Published Family Law Opinion Issued By Ky COA June 12, 2009

Howard v. Howard
The issues presented here are whether the trial
court was clearly erroneous in its determination that Appellant was voluntarily
underemployed, thereby justifying the trial court’s refusal to modify its prior child
support order; and whether the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005, 11 U.S.C. Sections 523(a)(5) and (15), precludes discharge
in bankruptcy of Appellant’s obligation to pay for the Dodge Durango automobile
as required by the court’s final decree. Digest to follow.


Howard v. Howard
The issues presented here are whether the trial
court was clearly erroneous in its determination that Appellant was voluntarily
underemployed, thereby justifying the trial court’s refusal to modify its prior child
support order; and whether the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005, 11 U.S.C. Sections 523(a)(5) and (15), precludes discharge
in bankruptcy of Appellant’s obligation to pay for the Dodge Durango automobile
as required by the court’s final decree. Digest to follow.

Recent Posts

Watch Partner Elizabeth Howell go Over the Edge for Gilda’s Club Kentuckiana!
July 10, 2023
Kentucky Court of Appeals Affirms Fayette Family Court Orders Finding Mother’s Choice in Schools Outside the Residential County to be Unreasonable and Awarding Attorney’s Fees
June 20, 2023
Kentucky Supreme Court Reverses and Remands Order Holding Non-Party Responsible for Attorney’s Fees Due to Non-Compliance with Subpoena
June 20, 2023