One To Be Published Family Law Opinion Issued By Ky COA June 12, 2009

Howard v. Howard
The issues presented here are whether the trial
court was clearly erroneous in its determination that Appellant was voluntarily
underemployed, thereby justifying the trial court’s refusal to modify its prior child
support order; and whether the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005, 11 U.S.C. Sections 523(a)(5) and (15), precludes discharge
in bankruptcy of Appellant’s obligation to pay for the Dodge Durango automobile
as required by the court’s final decree. Digest to follow.


Howard v. Howard
The issues presented here are whether the trial
court was clearly erroneous in its determination that Appellant was voluntarily
underemployed, thereby justifying the trial court’s refusal to modify its prior child
support order; and whether the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005, 11 U.S.C. Sections 523(a)(5) and (15), precludes discharge
in bankruptcy of Appellant’s obligation to pay for the Dodge Durango automobile
as required by the court’s final decree. Digest to follow.

Recent Posts

Kentucky Court of Appeals affirms Warren Family Court’s Order limiting natural father’s access to children’s educational records from school
October 25, 2022
Kentucky Court of Appeals affirms Boyd Circuit Court’s order terminating father’s parental rights pursuant to KRS 625.090
October 25, 2022
Kentucky Court of Appeals vacates Lewis County Family Court finding of abuse or neglect due to insufficient evidence to support finding
October 18, 2022