Divorce Law Journal

FEHR V. FEHR 2007-CA-001495 PUBLISHED: AFFIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING AND REMANDING IN PART THOMPSON PRESIDING COUNTY: OLDHAM DATE RENDERED: 10/3/2008

Young v. Carran, et.al. The issue presented is whether Appellant may maintain a private cause of action against an opposing law firm for violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) for the inadvertent...

Frances v. Frances involves relocation issues arising prior to the entry of a final custody decree. These were also the facts in Fenwick v. Fenwick, 114 S.W.3d 767 (Ky. 2003). The Kentucky Supreme Court now recognizes that the...

Frances v. Frances, but the real discussion of the law is in Pennington v. Marcum. Digest to follow.

Pennington v. Marcum, decided today by the Kentucky Supreme Court. Congratulations to Martha Rosenberg! I dreaded reading Justice Cunningham’s dissent, only to find him cite the “prestigious” AAML and our model relocation act as guidelines that could have...