In a contentious post-decree custody matter, the family court appointed a Friend of the Court (FOC) after Father moved to modify the existing custody and timesharing order. The FOC filed his report, in which he cited the children’s...
Father sought an award of attorney fees in a child support modification matter pursuant to CR 68(3). He argued that he was entitled to reimbursement of his attorney fees because Mother ran up his discovery costs after he...
After Mother killed Father in Henry County, Aunt initiated a DNA action in Bullitt County and was awarded temporary custody of Child. Paternal Grandparents – without knowledge of the Bullitt County DNA action – filed a visitation action...
Swan v. Gatewood Mother and Father were never married but shared one (1) child in common. Pursuant to the Parties’ mediated Agreement (“the Agreement”), the Parties were to share joint custody of their minor child and jointly make...
The court clarifies that while CR 37.02(3) does not apply to non-parties like Dr. Megronigle, there are other provisions in the rules that provide for sanctions against non-parties who disrupt the discovery process, such as CR 37.02(1)-(2).
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
