Coleman v. Coleman, Ky COA, Child as Witness

Coleman v. Coleman, 2010-CA-000277-ME

Coleman v. Coleman, 2010-CA-000277-ME

Published:   Vacating and Remanding

County: Washington

 

Statute allowing judge to interview child regarding child’s wishes in custody proceedings is permissive rather than mandatory; FC therefore did not abuse its discretion in refusing to interview child.  However, FC erred in not allowing child to testify without first conducting a hearing regarding child’s competency to testify, as all persons are qualified to testify and presumed competent to do so unless trial court make a specific finding of incompetency. If child is found to be competent, trial court may maintain control over interrogation and protect witnesses from harassment and undue embarrassment under KRE 611(a)(3). 

 

Digested by Michelle Eisenmenger Mapes, Diana L. Skaggs + Associates  

Recent Posts

Kentucky Court of Appeals affirms finding that Warren County Family Court properly found that a Power of Attorney for Temporary Delegation of Parental or Legal Custody and Care Pursuant to KRS 403.352 and KRS 403.353 does not require a family court to grant custody of a minor child to the parent’s named power of attorney when there is a finding of neglect of the parent – Published Opinion from Kentucky Court of Appeals
June 27, 2022
Kentucky Court of Appeals reverses and remands finding by Boyd County Circuit Court that a Grandmother and Uncle of a minor child lacked standing to pursue custody – Published Opinion from Kentucky Court of Appeals
June 27, 2022
How do I dress for court?
June 21, 2022