Woodson v. Woodson, Ky Supreme Court, Modification of Lump-Sum Maintenance, overruling Dame

Woodson v. Woodson

2010-SC-000053-DG

Published:  Reversing and Remanding

County: Jefferson

Overruling Dame v. Dame, SC held that “a maintenance award in a fixed amount to be paid out over a definite period of time is subject to modification under KRS 403 .250(1).” 

KRS 403 .250(1) states in part:

Woodson v. Woodson

2010-SC-000053-DG

Published:  Reversing and Remanding

County: Jefferson

Overruling Dame v. Dame, SC held that “a maintenance award in a fixed amount to be paid out over a definite period of time is subject to modification under KRS 403 .250(1).” 

KRS 403 .250(1) states in part:

"Except as otherwise provided in subsection (6) of KRS 403 .180, the provisions of any decree respecting maintenance may be modified only upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unconscionable." (Emphasis added.)

In giving the statute its obvious meaning, all decrees ‘respecting maintenance’ are modifiable under certain circumstances. This is precisely the point that was made by Justice Clayton in his dissent in Dame.

"In saying farewell to Dame, we do not belittle the compelling need for finality in all divorce cases. The burden of proof to change maintenance orders is sufficiently strict to insure relative stability and finality. It requires the showing of ‘changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unconscionable.’ KRS 403.250(1). However, the statute does not divest trial judges of the discretion to decide when modification outweighs the virtue of finality in seeking fairness and equity in what many times may be dire consequences and complicated options.”

Digested by Michelle Eisenmenger Mapes, Diana L. Skaggs + Associates  

Recent Posts

Flag of Kentucky
General Division of District Court Has Jurisdiction to Hear IPO Cases Involving Minors; GAL Must Be Appointed to Represent Minors in IPO Cases – Published Opinion from Supreme Court of Ky.
September 14, 2021
Hearsay Statements Detailing Abuse, Behavior, and Feelings to a Treating Therapist that Are Essential for Diagnosis and Treatment Are Properly Admissible; Hearsay Statements Regarding the Identity of the Perpetrator May Be Admissible – Published Opinion from Supreme Court of Ky.
September 14, 2021
Signature
Family Court Made Sufficient Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by Incorporating Oral Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by Reference into Written Order – Published Opinion from Supreme Court of Ky.
September 14, 2021