The Court of Appeals found that the Family Court “failed to state that its conclusions were made pursuant to the clear and convincing evidence standard.”
The Court held that U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)’s complete deprivation of an individual’s ability to possess a firearm was materially different than a sureties’ possible disarmament, if violated, and was therefore unconstitutional.
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services; Angela Lane; Jessica Humphrey; and Jennifer Clay v. R.C., a Child; and M.C., No. 2022-CA-0921-ME Barren Circuit Court After the Cabinet filed a dependency, neglect, and abuse Petition on...
James Eric Bankston v. Jennifer S. Mattingly, No. 2021-CA-1490-MR Marion Circuit Court Mom and Dad, joint custodians of one child, disagreed on who should be permitted to claim Child for tax purposes. Dad – who had a significantly...
Christina Holt Taylor v. Leigh-Ann Fitzpatrick, No. 2022-CA-0946-ME Allen Circuit Court Allen Family Court entered an IPO against Respondent in 2019 based on Petitioner’s allegations that Respondent stalked, harassed, and threatened her. Shortly before it was set to...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok