The Court of Appeals found that the Family Court “failed to state that its conclusions were made pursuant to the clear and convincing evidence standard.”
The Court held that U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)’s complete deprivation of an individual’s ability to possess a firearm was materially different than a sureties’ possible disarmament, if violated, and was therefore unconstitutional.
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services; Angela Lane; Jessica Humphrey; and Jennifer Clay v. R.C., a Child; and M.C., No. 2022-CA-0921-ME Barren Circuit Court After the Cabinet filed a dependency, neglect, and abuse Petition on...
James Eric Bankston v. Jennifer S. Mattingly, No. 2021-CA-1490-MR Marion Circuit Court Mom and Dad, joint custodians of one child, disagreed on who should be permitted to claim Child for tax purposes. Dad – who had a significantly...
Christina Holt Taylor v. Leigh-Ann Fitzpatrick, No. 2022-CA-0946-ME Allen Circuit Court Allen Family Court entered an IPO against Respondent in 2019 based on Petitioner’s allegations that Respondent stalked, harassed, and threatened her. Shortly before it was set to...
